We use cookies to understand how visitors use our site and improve your experience. Cookie Policy.
Most early-stage founders price against cost. Their customers would have paid three times as much. Here is the thinking process that gets you to the right number.
There is a pricing conversation that happens in almost every early-stage SaaS company, and it goes roughly like this. Someone opens a spreadsheet, calculates server costs, adds a margin, looks at what competitors charge, and lands on a number that feels reasonable. That number is almost always too low. Not by a little. Often by a factor of five or ten.
Pricing against cost is the most common and most damaging pricing mistake founders make. It feels rational. You know your costs, you add a margin, you have a price. The problem is that price is not about your costs. It is about the value the buyer receives. Those are completely different numbers, and confusing them is how you end up with a business that works technically but cannot grow.
Value-based pricing starts with a simple question: what is it worth to the buyer if this problem is solved? If your product saves a sales manager five hours a week, and their time is worth £100 an hour, you are delivering £500 a week in value, roughly £2,000 a month. Pricing your product at £20 a month is not generous. It is a signal that you do not understand what you built.
The calculation does not need to be precise. It needs to be honest. What outcome does your product create? What is that outcome worth to the person buying it? Build your pricing from there and work backwards to make sure your margin is sustainable. The gap between cost-based pricing and value-based pricing is almost always large enough to fund real growth.
Founders undercharge for a few consistent reasons. The first is empathy gone wrong: they imagine themselves as the buyer and price for what they personally would pay, not what the actual buyer would pay. The second is fear: charging more feels riskier, because it raises the stakes of every sales conversation. The third is comparison: they look at what competitors charge and anchor to that number, even when the competitors are also wrong.
The counterintuitive truth is that charging more often makes selling easier. A higher price signals confidence. It attracts buyers who take the investment seriously and churn less. It gives you the margin to improve the product and support customers properly. A too-low price attracts price-sensitive buyers who will leave the moment something cheaper appears.
SparkVox is priced on the value of the outcome, not the cost of running the infrastructure. The outcome is a LinkedIn post that would have taken an hour to write, produced in minutes, without a subscription that charges you whether you use it or not. The pricing model itself is a statement about where the value sits.
If you are building a SaaS product right now, the most important pricing exercise you can do is to sit with a customer and ask them to walk you through what their life looks like without your product, and what it looks like with it. Then price the distance between those two states. You will almost certainly land higher than you are today. And your business will be better for it.
Every SaaS playbook says recurring revenue is the goal. Here's why I deliberately went the other way, and why it's the product decision I am most confident about.
No benchmark. No competitor to undercut. No industry standard to anchor to. Here's the thinking process for pricing in a category you are building alone.
After 300 founder interviews, certain patterns only show up above a certain exit size. Here are the ones that surprised me most.
